Exposing the “De-escalation Lobby” in Times of National Crisis
In every yug, Dharma is tested not just by external rakshasas, but by internal traitors who seek to weaken the righteous from within. Today, as Bharat faces persistent threats from Pakistan—an artificial, jihadi-exporting state built on hatred for Sanatan civilization—we find not just enemies across the border, but saboteurs among us.
These are the modern-day Jaichands, cloaked in the language of "peace", "dialogue", and "human rights", who begin their “de-escalation” campaigns not after a war—but just when Bharat rises to strike back.
Why Do They Appear Only When Bharat Hits Back?
Let’s understand the pattern:
-
When our soldiers & civilians are killed (like in Poonch, pahalgum, etc), these peace-peddlers stay silent.
-
When our civilians are killed in terror attacks, they blame “poverty” or “radicalization”.
-
But when Bharat retaliates—like Present Indo-Pak War, Surgical Strikes (2016) or Balakot Air Strikes (2019)—they suddenly flood media and academia with cries of:
-
“De-escalate”
-
“Dialogue is the only way”
-
“Both sides must show restraint”
-
This false equivalence between Bharat (a civilizational nation defending itself) and Pakistan (a terror sponsor state) is not peace activism—it’s intellectual treason.
The Sanatan View: Shanti Is Meaningless Without Shakti
Sanatan Dharma never glorified cowardice. Shri Krishna didn’t de-escalate at Kurukshetra; He demanded that Arjuna rise and do his Kshatriya dharma.
“Paritranaya Sadhunam, Vinashaya Cha Dushkritam…”
– The wicked must be destroyed to protect the righteous.
When we choose to strike back, it is not out of vengeance, but as a Dharmic responsibility to protect our citizens, sovereignty, and civilization. Those who ask us to “step back” in such times are acting against Dharma.
Who Are These “De-escalators”?
-
Leftist Intellectuals
-
They brand Bharat’s defensive actions as “hyper-nationalism”.
-
During Balakot strikes, many questioned the airstrikes' authenticity, asking for “proof”—but never ask for proof of Pakistan’s terror camps.
-
-
NGO-Centric Peace Networks
-
Funded by foreign agencies, they often push a “common humanity” narrative, ignoring the jihadi and genocidal ideology that drives Pakistan.
-
Counter-Notes and Responses
| Their Argument | Sanatani Response |
|---|---|
| “Violence begets violence” | No—Dharma begets peace. Violence is neutral; its righteousness depends on intent. |
| “Bharat must de-escalate to avoid war” | Bharat is already the victim. Asking a Dharmic defender to stand down is adharma. |
| “Think about humanity on both sides” | True. Which is why ending a terror-exporting regime like Pakistan is a service to humanity. |
| “War harms the poor” | And terror harms the innocent. Shall we abandon our villages to bombers and butchers? |
| “There’s no military solution to Kashmir” | Then why did Pakistan wage 4 wars? If war wasn’t a solution, why did they keep starting it? |
Final Thoughts: Stand with Bharat, Stand with Dharma
In times of war or terror, there is no neutrality. Either you stand with Rashtra and Dharma, or you assist Adharma and its enemies.
Vivekananda thundered, “Weakness is sin.” Today, as the children of Kshatriya warriors, we must not fall prey to cowardice dressed as compassion.
Comments
Post a Comment